Labeled Sequent Calculus and Countermodel Construction for Justification Logics
نویسنده
چکیده
Justification logics are modal-like logics that provide a framework for reasoning about epistemic justifications. This paper introduces labeled sequent calculi for justification logics, as well as for hybrid modal-justification logics. Using the method due to Sara Negri, we internalize the Kripke-style semantics of justification logics, known as Fitting models, within the syntax of the sequent calculus to produce labeled sequent calculus. We show that our labeled sequent calculi enjoy a weak subformula property, all of the rules are invertible and the structural rules (weakening and contraction) and cut are admissible. Finally soundness and completeness are established, and termination of proof search for some of the labeled systems are shown. We describe a procedure, for some of the labled systems, which produces a derivation for valid sequents and a countermodel for non-valid sequents. We also show a frame correspondence for justification logics in the context of labeled sequent calculus.
منابع مشابه
Proof Search and Countermodel Construction in Bi-intuitionistic Propositional Logic
Bi-intuitionistic propositional logic (also known as Heyting-Brouwer logic, subtractive logic) extends intuitionistic propositional logic with a connective that is dual to implication, called coimplication. It is the logic of bi-[Cartesian closed] categories and it also has a Kripke semantics. It first got the attention of C. Rauszer who studied it in a number of papers. Later, it has been inve...
متن کاملProofs and Countermodels in Non-Classical Logics
Proofs and countermodels are the two sides of completeness proofs, but, in general, failure to find one does not automatically give the other. The limitation is encountered also for decidable non-classical logics in traditional completeness proofs based on Henkin’s method of maximal consistent sets of formulas. A method is presented that makes it possible to establish completeness in a direct w...
متن کاملRealization for justification logics via nested sequents: Modularity through embedding
Justification logics are refinements of modal logics, where justification terms replace modalities. Modal and justification logics are connected via the so-called realization theorems. We develop a general constructive method of proving the realization of a modal logic in an appropriate justification logic by means of cut-free modal nested sequent systems. We prove a constructive realization th...
متن کاملIntuitionisitic Tableau Extracted
This paper presents a formalization of a sequent presentation of intuitionisitic propositional logic and proof of decidability. The proof is implemented in the Nuprl system and the resulting proof object yields a “correct-by-construction” program for deciding intuitionisitc propositional sequents. The extracted program turns out to be an implementation of the tableau algorithm. If the argument ...
متن کاملOn the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub-classical Logics
Proof theory reveals a wide mosaic of possibilities for sub-classical logics. These are logics that are strictly contained (as consequence relations) in classical logic. Thus, by choosing a subset of axioms and derivation rules that are derivable in (some proof system for) classical logic, one easily obtains a (proof system for a) sub-classical logic. Various important and useful non-classical ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1401.1065 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014